Saturday, September 22, 2012

2013 Honda Accord arrives, and the crowd goes mild: Motoramic Drives

2013 Honda Accord arrives, and the crowd goes mild: Motoramic Drives
"The Honda Accord is the greatest car in the world," the guy with the inexplicable mini-Mohawk, a lead designer for the company, was saying. "It is, absolutely, without question."
He said this live-miked while sitting in a brand-new 2013 model on the patio of a resort in Santa Barbara. Two-dozen car reviewers circled around him like buzzards, waiting for him to utter something else outrageous and uncomfortable. His Honda co-workers gritted their teeth, muttering shutupshutupshutup under their breath. This was the definition of an oversell. At some point, the guy realized he'd stepped outside the bounds of conventional car hype, saying, "What I meant is that the Accord does its job better than any car in the world." But the statement had already been released into the wild, ready to be judged.
Shockingly, the Honda Accord is not the greatest car in the world. It never has been, not even close, and, barring some catastrophic event where dozens of contemporary models are suddenly wiped away from history and memory, it never will be. The 2013 update of the Accord will be available in many flavors, with a 4-cylinder engine or a 6-cylinder one, as an automatic 4-door, a manual coupe, or a CVT, and even, starting early next year, as a plug-in hybrid. It boasts a tighter rear and slightly sleeker lines than previous models. But no matter the iteration, the Accord will be what it has been for more than 30 years, a reliable, safe, reasonably comfortable, moderately priced family sedan running between $23,000 and $33,000. Few will be amazed and even fewer will be offended.
On a beautiful day in mid-August, I drove several different versions of the new Accord. The first one my partner and I got was a 278-hp V-6 with all the trimmings. Family sedans don't tend to be that fun to drive, and this new Accord wasn't much of an exception. The front end felt a little sluggish, it didn't corner brilliantly, nor did it accelerate with a ton of gusto. Everything seemed a bit heavy, including the brakes. The transmission, when we put it into Sport mode, whined and churned when it was switching gears. It was fine. The Accord never really claimed to be a driver's car.
2013 Honda Accord arrives, and the crowd goes mild: Motoramic Drives
But it also had great leg room and fantastic visibility. Compared with other cars of its class, where window height sometimes feels like an afterthought, the Accord seemed to boast a 360-degree panorama, lacking only a glass floor, a perk which no car maker has yet figured out how to safely install. The Accord had other strengths, too. Side cameras, which can be turned on and off, worked extremely well, greatly mitigating the dangers of the blind spot. The rest of the electronic safety-warning apparatus was also efficient, smart, and not annoying.
The version we had was fully appointed, with breathable leather seats and a bit of faux-wood panelling, a higher-end version of the Accord than most people will buy, more like an entry-level Lexus, Infiniti, or, dare I say it, an Acura. At the very least, it almost exactly resembled a high-end Toyota Camry. That's one of the problems with the Accord, though, or maybe with all mid-range cars these days: They're mostly alike.
At one point in our drive, we got stuck on a country road, where we were winding toward a winery to be fed like pigs at the trough. A car crawled along in front of us. I wondered why the test-driver was going so slowly; even when they're running a quotidian Accord through its paces, car writers try to drive like the Sennas they imagine themselves to be. But as we got closer, I saw that it was actually a Hyundai Elantra, not being test-driven at all. At other points in the day, I mistook a Taurus, an Impala, and even an older Accord for the new one. Such are the perils of a crowded category.
After lunch, I got into a 4-cylinder Accord with a CVT. This one had cloth seats with bland gray material that looked like something you'd find at an assisted-living home, no automatic seat adjustments, none of the bells and whistles of the earlier version, and about 30 percent less power to boot. It drove as you might expect. Eh. But it was still roomy, still air-tight safe, and still had the same excellent wraparound view. It also will cost less, and should easily meet the expectations of the thousands of faithful Accord customers that Honda has carefully cultivated over the decades.
2013 Honda Accord arrives, and the crowd goes mild: Motoramic Drives
On fuel economy, Honda has followed the crowd; the most-efficient 4-cylinder gets a 29 mpg combined and 35 mpg on the highway; the 6-cylinder matches the 25 mpg combined posted by the 2013 Nissan Altima. Honda hasn't released details on its hybrid version, which never sold well in its previous edition, and won't go on sale until next summer.
Later, I also drove a preview version of the Accord plug-in hybrid, arriving in about six months. Like the Prius plug-in, it has an all-electric range of 12-15 miles, and like all electric cars, it boasts a zippier, cleaner-feeling drive than a combustion-driven engine does. With the Fit EV, Honda has proven it can do electric as well as any manufacturer, and the Accord plug-in should be a nice arrow to add to Honda's growing alternative-fuels quiver.
It's been a rougher-than-usual period for Honda. The Japan earthquake and tsunami devastated production and development. The most recent Civic, its other flagship car, has decent sales numbers, but has been savaged by critics. Consumer Reports called it one of "five cars you're buying but probably shouldn't." The company needs the Accord to do well, and it almost certainly will.
The 2013 Accord isn't going to get you laid. No one's going to write songs about its excellent safety features and visibility. But those are precisely the qualities that will allow it to continue to vie for the top spot in the car industry's most hotly contested segment. It's not the greatest car in the world, but it's among the most competent and reliable. Absolutely, and without question.

2013 Honda Accord

CLASS Midsize sedan and coupe
ENGINES 2.4-liter 4-cylinder; 3.5-liter V-6
TRANSMISSIONS 6-speed automatic, CVT or manual
POWER 185 hp (4-cylinder); 278 hp (V-6)
TORQUE 181 ft.-lbs.; 252 ft.-lbs.
WEIGHT 3,100 lbs. -- 3,500 lbs.
0-60 MPH N/A
EMISSIONS 5.1 tons/year
MILEAGE 26/35 city/highway (4-cyl. w/CVT)
PRICE RANGE $21,680 -- $33,430
CONS All the excitement of slicing white bread
PROS Honda preserved all the reasons people buy Accords

Source: Yahoo! Autos

Friday, September 21, 2012

2013 Buick Encore priced at $24,950

2013 Buick Encore priced at $24,950
The 2013 Buick Encore crossover will cost $24,950, including a $750 destination charge. The top trim package, called Premium, will sticker at $28,940.
A 1.4-liter turbocharged engine will power the small SUV, which competes against the Acura RDX, Hyundai Tucson and the Ford Escape. The output of the turbo mill is 138 hp and 148 lb-ft of torque. Both front- and all-wheel-drive versions are offered with a six-speed automatic transmission.
GM says the Encore is the most fuel-efficient crossover produced by a domestic maker. It returns 25 mpg in the city and 33 on the highway.
The base model gets 18-inch wheels, a rearview camera and a seven-inch LCD screen. The Convenience group package adds dual-zone climate control, a 120-volt outlet, an auto-dimming rearview mirror, remote start and fog lights. Moving further up in price, the Leather group adds leather, heated seats, heated steering wheel, a power passenger seat and driver’s seat memory. The top trim gains park assist, lane departure warning, premium audio with a subwoofer and rain-sensing windshield wipers.
All-wheel drive will cost you $1,500, while the navigation box can be checked for $795.
The 2013 Buick Encore will arrive at dealerships in the first quarter of 2013.

2013 Ford Fusion Drive Review

2013 Ford Fusion Drive Review
What Is It? The Ford Fusion is the biggest-selling car in the Ford lineup – only the F-150 pickup truck moves out the dealership doors faster. So when it came time to redo the Fusion, Ford put major resources behind it to make it not only just what customers want, but to give them stuff they didn't think they'd ever get. The Fusion is Ford's best shot aimed directly at the soft white underbelly of the massive mid-sized sedan segment. The mid-sized sedan segment is where Camrys - the most mind-numbingly bland cars ever made - rule the roost. People in this segment don't want styling, performance or prestige. They're never going to line up against any other mid-sized sedan at a stop light and go for pinks. These buyers can't afford the luxury of styling, performance and fun.
Yet Ford gave it to them anyway. Look at that snout: there's more Aston Martin in that grille than most real Astons Martin. And those nice proportions and swoopy lines down the side give even the stylish Hyundai Sonata midsize sedan a run for its fashion dollar. Inside there are the most comfortable seats in the class and one of the most modern and clean dashes, too.
But the main draw of the new Fusion is that it offers powertrains for just about everybody: four engines, two transmissions and your choice of six-speed manual (with the entry –level engine) or six-speed automatic (in everything else).
What's It Like To Drive? We started out with the fwd 178-hp 1.6-liter EcoBoost with gasoline direct injection, six-speed automatic and the $295 Start-Stop option. Ford figures you get about 3.5 percent better mileage with Start-Stop than without it. It doesn't always cut off the engine at a stop light, for instance, if you have the a/c blasting and it's a hot day it might keep the engine running. Mileage is rated at 25 city/37 hwy/29 combined. The starting and stopping were accomplished with almost no lurching or clunking at all – you barely feel the transition from on to off. The engine starts as soon as you take your foot off the brake. Even though it was a little underpowered it was kind of fun to drive and even got from 0-60 in 9.0 seconds.
Next we drove the Fusion Hybrid with the 2.0-liter Atkinson-cycle four and 1.4 kWh lithium ion battery providing boost. It was very quiet, smooth and, like the rest of the Fusion line, spacious inside. Ford claims mileage of 47 across the board. On a 14-mile drive loop during which we drove very badly we got 20.8 mpg indicated on the little dash readout. Your mileage will vary, especially if you're doing the EPA city loop. We did get it to 60 mph in 8.5 seconds, so it's better than the 1.-6 version in that regard.
Then we drove the 240-hp 2.0-liter EcoBoost turbo four with all-wheel drive. The awd is usually fwd until the car senses rear-wheel slip, at which point it engages a clutch integrated with the rear differential and the rear wheels start gripping. We never engaged that clutch but did launch the thing as hard as we could, which wasn't very hard at all, and got to 60 mph in just under seven seconds. That's not bad by the standards of the class. Our car had the optional 19-inch wheels with 235/40 ContiPro Contacs and so might have felt a little grippier and a little sportier.
We also drove a 1.6 with the manual transmission and found we liked the shifter, clutch engagement (though takeup was a bit high in the pedal travel) and easy driveability.
There was none of the 2.5-liter fours with sequential multi-port injection to drive so we can't tell you much about that one. Ford says it gets only 26 mpg combined.
Overall, the Fusion came across as a very comfortable car to both sit in – which we did half the time - and drive – which we did the other half. There was room both front and back and the side bolsters on both the sport seats and the regular seats were surprisingly comfortable. The trunk was plenty huge, offering 16 cubic feet of space, or a little less than 12 with the hybrid battery back there. By the admittedly low standards of the class, it was fun to drive. We got no track time so we can't tell you at what point it starts to understeer but we did enjoy two days of driving these new Fusions all over the Santa Monica Mountains and came away unfatigued and mostly satisfied.
Do I want It? With such a wide variety of powertrains available there's something for everybody. The Fusion S with the relatively low-tech 2.5-liter engine starts at $22,495, including the $795 destination charge; the SE starts at $24,495 and an awd Titanium-trim Fusion starts at $32,995. There are so many ways to position options, trim levels and drivetrain possibilities that we can't begin to sort them all out here. Our favorite might be (as is always the case) a combination that isn't available – the 240-hp twin-turbo 2.0-liter Ecoboost four with the six-speed manual. The plug-in Fusion Energi Hybrid will be on sale in the first quarter of next year and there are other EcoBoost engines supposedly on their way, too. It could get confusing. But with such a huge market to address, Ford has to offer something for everyone, and it's certainly done that with the new Fusion.
2013 Ford Fusion
Base Price: $22,495
Base Drivetrain: 2.5-liter I4; 175 hp at 6000 rpm, 175 lb ft at 4500 rpm
Base Curb Weight: 3615 pounds
Base Fuel Economy (EPA): 22/34/26

2013 Ford Fusion Drive Review
2013 Ford Fusion Drive Review
2013 Ford Fusion Drive Review
2013 Ford Fusion Drive Review
2013 Ford Fusion Drive Review
2013 Ford Fusion Drive Review
2013 Ford Fusion Drive Review
2013 Ford Fusion Drive Review
2013 Ford Fusion Drive Review

2012 Toyota Prius Four car review

2012 Toyota Prius Four car review
No one buys a Toyota Prius to get anywhere quickly. At least we haven't met any folks as such, and after running the car through our autofile paces, we have the quantitative data to back up why it would be stupid to do so.
(Why the Prius isn't the most environmentally smart automotive choice one can make? Well, that's a a whole 'nuther story.)
The Prius does satisfy other automotive yens, however, as witnessed by all the owners we heard from, and while hardly an unequivocally adored vehicle, those who shelled out money for their own copies demonstrate a measure of respect and appreciation. One owner “love[s] it for what it is,” while another admits, “It's pretty boring, though.”
But sprinkled throughout is testimony to the car's overriding reliability, its excellent fuel economy and a fuss-free ownership experience. Owners love the roominess afforded the hatchback, the extra rear-seat room thanks to a lack of a hump in the floor and the overall ergonomics.
That's not to say owners didn't find nits to pick with the Prius. One owner lamented the sea of hard plastic, while another complained of too many rattles erupting all over the cabin. “I'm not crazy about the backup bell inside the cab,” another owner from Oregon pointed out. “It should be outside to warn people when I'm backing up.”
We also heard gripes about the sticker. “The price is a bit too high,” said one, a beef echoed by others.
We felt the same when we first took delivery of our test car, a 2012 Prius Four. The Four in its name denotes the trim level, and while it comes standard with a nice array of features, its base sticker comes in at a not very low price of $28,995. Tack on a Deluxe Solar Roof package, and the price jumps up another $3,820. A couple of odds and ends brought the final tally for our Prius Four tester to $33,118.
Perhaps some pricing perspective is in order. A base model 2012 BMW 128i, for example, starts at just $32,095. Sure, it doesn't come with the same features, but it's a BMW.
Or how about this: A 2012 Honda Insight with navigation and every possible options box checked tops out at $26,540.
Still, many people believe in the car's value, fully 93,741 through the first six months of this year—and that's with its federal tax incentives fully exhausted. But besides fuel economy, car enthusiasts—Autoweek readers—want to know exactly what kind of performance one can expect from any car, even a Prius.
The short answer: Not too much. We found the car extremely slow, requiring 10.6 seconds to reach 60 mph from a standstill, and its skinny tires didn't do much for stopping power, eating up 137.9 feet to stop from that speed. And for as small a car as the Prius is, it still only managed 38.9 mph through our slalom (the Toyota Camry reached 41 mph) and a miserable 0.68 g of lateral acceleration.
Better rubber would go a long way toward improving the car's grip, but the Prius would still suffer from mediocre chassis tuning and a super anemic powertrain.

2012 Toyota Prius Four

STICKER
Base price: $28,995
As-tested price: $33,118
CHASSIS
Five-passenger hatchback
CAPACITIES
Fuel (gal): 11.9
Cargo volume (cu ft): 21.6
Headroom/legroom (in): 38.6 / 42.5 (front) 37.6 / 36.0 rear
ENGINE
1.8-liter I4
Power: 98 hp
Torque: 105 lb-ft
Electric motor and NiMH battery: 134 net hp
DRIVETRAIN
Front-wheel drive
Continuous Variable Transmission
SAFETY
NHTSA: Five-star overall
Standard airbags: 7
STANDING-START ACCELERATION
0-60 mph: 10.6 sec
Quarter-mile: 18.0 sec @ 79.2 mph
BRAKING
60-0 mph: 137.9 ft
FUEL ECONOMY
EPA combined: 50 mpg
AW observed: 43.8 mpg
RESIDUALS
Three-year: $15,077
Five-year: $11,308


Owner's Voices

- After researching hybrids, I purchased a Prius and have 9,200 miles on it while averaging 48.7 mpg. It continues to amaze me with its fantastic gas mileage, remains a pleasure to drive and hasn't developed any squeaks or rattles.
This is the first car I've owned not requiring any adjustments or repairs in the first year. It does what they say it will with amazing engineering.
I recommend the Prius to anyone who wants a reliable and well-built car with excellent gas mileage. It's surprisingly roomy with a very convenient design and ergonomics. The only thing I would change is reduce the amount of hard plastic found on areas that are touched frequently.
Bill Christopherson, Walnut, Calif.
- I have about 20,000 miles on my Prius and love it for what it is. I especially like the gas mileage and hatchback utility. I get about 50 mpg in mixed commuting and around 45 mpg on the highway trips. It has been completely trouble-free so far. The car isn't sporty but . . . rides decently.
Christopher Gerhart, Kokomo, Ind.
- My current Prius replaced my previousgeneration 2009 model. The new one gets a bit better mileage, but like the older one, it works hard with my 90-mile-per-day commute.
I use it to pull a small boat trailer a few times a year without any trouble. In eight years of Prius ownership, I've never brought the car in for nonscheduled maintenance.
It's comfortable, quick, big and versatile enough for me and utterly reliable. It's pretty boring though, but is the ideal car for someone who doesn't want to be irritated by intrusive car issues. Gas it up once in a while and forget it.
Bob Ljungquist, Goshen, Conn.


Others Considered

2012 Honda Insight EX, $22,755
2012 Volkswagen Jetta TDI Premium with DSG, $26,085
2013 Ford Fusion SE hybrid, $27,995


AUTOFILE NEEDS YOU!

We seek comments from owners of these vehicles: 2011-12 Chevrolet Silverado, 2011-12 Honda Accord, 2012 Mercedes-Benz C-class

2012 Toyota Prius Four car review
2012 Toyota Prius Four car review
2012 Toyota Prius Four car review
2012 Toyota Prius Four car review
2012 Toyota Prius Four car review
2012 Toyota Prius Four car review
2012 Toyota Prius Four car review
2012 Toyota Prius Four car review
2012 Toyota Prius Four car review

Porsche 918 Spyder clocks a time of 7:14 on the ‘Ring

Porsche 918 Spyder clocks a time of 7:14 on the ‘Ring
Porsche has announced an official Nürburgring lap time of 7 minutes, 14 seconds for the 918 Spyder following a series of official tests with prototypes of the advanced gasoline-electric hybrid supercar at the famed German circuit this week.
Although Porsche isn’t prepared to confirm who was driving the early version of the 918 Spyder at the time, it does say the lap time was achieved with a prototype boasting what it describes as an optional Weissach package that provides a series of yet-to-be revealed handling tweaks and on standard Michelin road tires.
“With a time of 7:14, the 918 Spyder has confirmed the potential of its future-orientated driveline concept after just a few months of testing,” said Frank Walliser, head of the 918 Spyder development.
The official lap time for the 918 Spyder is among the fastest for a road-legal car at the Nürburgring’s Nordschleife circuit, undercutting by some 18 seconds the fastest time of its predecessor, the Carrera GT, achieved back in 2004.
As well as confirming the 918 Spyder’s testing pace at the Nürburgring, Porsche has also revealed its hybrid driveline puts out 784 hp. Powering the new two-seater is a mid-mounted 4.6-liter V8 gasoline engine loosely based on that used by the Porsche RS Spyder race car and a pair of electric motors mounted within the front-axle assembly.
The 918 Spyder is planned to go into production at Porsche’s Zuffenhausen headquarters on the outskirts of Stuttgart on Sept. 18, 2013.